[lustre-discuss] lustre-2.10.1 Data on MDT

Jones, Peter A peter.a.jones at intel.com
Wed Mar 14 12:20:56 PDT 2018


Megan

Data on MDT is introduced in the upcoming 2.11 release and is not in 2.10.1

Peter

On 2018-03-14, 12:15 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Ms. Megan Larko" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of dobsonunit at gmail.com<mailto:dobsonunit at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello List!

I have a very small test cluster with Lustre-2.10.1 on both client and server.
I am testing Progressive File Layout and Data on MDT functions.

The backing file system on the Lustre targets is ZFS-0.7.6-1 and the OS is CentOS 7.3.1611.  The storage was built from source on the cluster itself.

PFL functions as described in the lustre_manual.pdf  Chapter 19.5.
In attempting to test Data on MDT (DoM) which uses PFL, my "lfs setstripe" command does not recognize the "-L mdt" flag.   It is not included in the "man lfs-setstripe" for my 2.10.1 lustre and trying to use the command example in the lustre_manual.pdf Chapter 20 2.1.1 example:
> lfs setstripe  -E 1M -L mdt -E -1 -S 4M -c -1 /mnt/L210/DoM_test
fails with "setstripe: invalid option -- 'L' ..." and prints the setstripe help.

Sure enough "man lfs-setstripe" does not show the existence of the -L mdt option described in the manual Chapter 20.

Has DoM landed yet?  If yes, in what lustre version?
If DoM is in lustre-2.10.1, is my syntax faulty?

P.S.  I am already looking at moving the test system to lustre-2.10.3 because of LU-9529/LU-9530 lfs migrate item.

Cheers,
megan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20180314/98a17683/attachment.html>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list