[lustre-discuss] slow write performance from client to server
Riccardo Veraldi
Riccardo.Veraldi at cnaf.infn.it
Tue Oct 16 16:44:51 PDT 2018
On 10/16/18 5:54 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> Have you tried running 2.10.5 on a RHEL6 client?
hello, sorry I did not do that but I think it is my next option.
> On 2018-10-16, 2:13 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Riccardo Veraldi" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of Riccardo.Veraldi at cnaf.infn.it> wrote:
>
> On 10/16/18 2:08 AM, George Melikov wrote:
> > Please post your benchmark method.
>
> my benchmark method is by using bbcp.
>
> lustre clients 2.10.5 on RHEL7 are fast (1.1GB/s) while RHEL6 clients
> using 2.8.0 perform very poorly (2MB/s)
>
>
> >
> > ____________________________________
> > Sincerely,
> > George Melikov,
> > Tel. 7-915-278-39-36
> > Skype: georgemelikov
> >
> >
> > 16.10.2018, 12:03, "Riccardo Veraldi" <riccardo.veraldi at cnaf.infn.it>:
> >> On 10/15/18 4:59 PM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev wrote:
> >>> You can do a quick check with 2.10.5 client by mounting lustre on MDS if you do not have free node to install 2.10.5 client.
> >>>
> >>> Do you have lnet configured with IB or 10GE? LNet defaults to tcp if not set. Can it be you are connected through slow management network?
> >>>
> >>> Alex.
> >> hi, my lnet is configured with both IB and 10GE. it is using IB I
> >> verified it and anyway performance is very slow even if it where just
> >> using tcp on 10GE
> >>
> >> since I only get 2MB/s
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >>> On 10/15/18, 6:41 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Riccardo Veraldi" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of Riccardo.Veraldi at cnaf.infn.it> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I have a new Lustre FS version 2.10.5. 18 OSTs 18TB each on 3 OSSes.
> >>>
> >>> I noticed very slow performances couple of MB/sec when RHEL6 Lustre
> >>> clients 2.8.0 are writing to the fielsystem.
> >>>
> >>> Could it be a Lustre version problem server vs client ?
> >>>
> >>> I have no errors either on server or client side that can debug it
> >>> further...
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>>
> >>> Rick
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lustre-discuss mailing list
> >>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.lustre.org_listinfo.cgi_lustre-2Ddiscuss-2Dlustre.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=23V5nhLj03jeTboyg6QveA&m=ABK5Lf73Df1JeZ-ryuh87ds4a5qoTk1gcookZ1auOuU&s=3gW-gvhmg4r0oQv3isx4u1P2TBHOzyDeFC-MZoxR68Y&e=
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lustre-discuss mailing list
> >> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list