[lustre-discuss] Which release to use?
Peter Jones
pjones at whamcloud.com
Fri Feb 22 12:18:44 PST 2019
Nathan
Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can see the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12 . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺
Peter
From: Nathan R Crawford <nrcrawfo at uci.edu>
Reply-To: "nathan.crawford at uci.edu" <nathan.crawford at uci.edu>
Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM
To: Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com>
Cc: "lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?
Hi Peter,
Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch (https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.
"Be patient" is an acceptable response :)
-Nate
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com<mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com>> wrote:
2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an interim development build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for production purposes.
On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de>> wrote:
Hi all,
in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which version should
i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd Melchers
--
Archiv- und Backup-Service | fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Freie Universität Berlin | Tel. +49-30-838-55905
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
--
Dr. Nathan Crawford nathan.crawford at uci.edu<mailto:nathan.crawford at uci.edu>
Modeling Facility Director
Department of Chemistry
1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508
Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20190222/0b47e5ed/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list