[lustre-discuss] Which release to use?

[Nathan R Crawford]

Thanks for the link! I'll spin up a test system with 2.12.0 and see what
breaks.
-Nate

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:20 PM Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com> wrote:

> Nathan
>
>
>
> Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and
> 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for
> more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can see
> the patches that will land starting to accumulate here -
> https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12
> . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> *From: *Nathan R Crawford <nrcrawfo at uci.edu>
> *Reply-To: *"nathan.crawford at uci.edu" <nathan.crawford at uci.edu>
> *Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM
> *To: *Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com>
> *Cc: *"lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?
>
>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
>
>
>   Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up
> to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch (
> https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12)
> has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS
> branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started
> appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.
>
>
>
>   "Be patient" is an acceptable response :)
>
>
>
> -Nate
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com> wrote:
>
> 2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x
> (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then
> using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an
> interim development build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for
> production purposes.
>
> On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" <
> lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of
> melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>     in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which
> version should
>     i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System?
>
>     Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>     Bernd Melchers
>
>     --
>     Archiv- und Backup-Service | fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de
>     Freie Universität Berlin   | Tel. +49-30-838-55905
>     _______________________________________________
>     lustre-discuss mailing list
>     lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dr. Nathan Crawford              nathan.crawford at uci.edu
>
> Modeling Facility Director
>
> Department of Chemistry
>
> 1102 Natural Sciences II         Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
>
> University of California, Irvine  Phone: 949-824-4508
>
> Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
>
>

-- 

Dr. Nathan Crawford              nathan.crawford at uci.edu
Modeling Facility Director
Department of Chemistry
1102 Natural Sciences II         Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
University of California, Irvine  Phone: 949-824-4508
Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20190222/50854e34/attachment-0001.html>