[lustre-discuss] Which release to use?

[Riccardo Veraldi]

I am using Lustre 2.12.0 and seems workign pretty well, anyway I built 
it against zfs 0.7.12 libraries... was it a mistake ?
what's the zfs release that Lustre 2.12.0 is built/tested on ?


On 2/22/19 12:18 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> Nathan
>
> Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 
> and 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to 
> allow for more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. 
> You can see the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - 
> https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12 
> . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺
>
> Peter
>
> *From: *Nathan R Crawford <nrcrawfo at uci.edu>
> *Reply-To: *"nathan.crawford at uci.edu" <nathan.crawford at uci.edu>
> *Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM
> *To: *Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com>
> *Cc: *"lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?
>
> Hi Peter,
>
>   Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading 
> up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch 
> (https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) 
> has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a 
> LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started 
> appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.
>
>   "Be patient" is an acceptable response :)
>
> -Nate
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com 
> <mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com>> wrote:
>
>     2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over
>     2.10.x (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate
>     requirement then using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more
>     comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an interim development build for
>     2.13 and should absolutely not be used for production purposes.
>
>     On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd
>     Melchers" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of
>     melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de <mailto:melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>         in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51.
>     Which version should
>         i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System?
>
>         Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>         Bernd Melchers
>
>         --
>         Archiv- und Backup-Service | fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de
>     <mailto:fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de>
>         Freie Universität Berlin   | Tel. +49-30-838-55905
>         _______________________________________________
>         lustre-discuss mailing list
>     lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     lustre-discuss mailing list
>     lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>     <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
> -- 
>
> Dr. Nathan Crawfordnathan.crawford at uci.edu  <mailto:nathan.crawford at uci.edu>
> Modeling Facility Director
> Department of Chemistry
> 1102 Natural Sciences II         Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
> University of California, Irvine  Phone: 949-824-4508
> Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20190222/01bb82d1/attachment-0001.html>