[lustre-discuss] Which release to use?

[Patrick Farrell]

Please file bugs if anything does!

- Patrick
________________________________
From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of Nathan R Crawford <nrcrawfo at uci.edu>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 7:04:24 PM
To: Peter Jones
Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?

Thanks for the link! I'll spin up a test system with 2.12.0 and see what breaks.
-Nate

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:20 PM Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com<mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com>> wrote:

Nathan



Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can see the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12 . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺



Peter



From: Nathan R Crawford <nrcrawfo at uci.edu<mailto:nrcrawfo at uci.edu>>
Reply-To: "nathan.crawford at uci.edu<mailto:nathan.crawford at uci.edu>" <nathan.crawford at uci.edu<mailto:nathan.crawford at uci.edu>>
Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM
To: Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com<mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com>>
Cc: "lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>" <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>>
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?



Hi Peter,



  Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch (https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.



  "Be patient" is an acceptable response :)



-Nate



On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com<mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com>> wrote:

2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an interim development build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for production purposes.

On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:melchers at zedat.fu-berlin.de>> wrote:

    Hi all,
    in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which version should
    i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System?

    Mit freundlichen Grüßen
    Bernd Melchers

    --
    Archiv- und Backup-Service | fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:fab-service at zedat.fu-berlin.de>
    Freie Universität Berlin   | Tel. +49-30-838-55905
    _______________________________________________
    lustre-discuss mailing list
    lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org




--

Dr. Nathan Crawford              nathan.crawford at uci.edu<mailto:nathan.crawford at uci.edu>

Modeling Facility Director

Department of Chemistry

1102 Natural Sciences II         Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II

University of California, Irvine  Phone: 949-824-4508

Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA


--

Dr. Nathan Crawford              nathan.crawford at uci.edu<mailto:nathan.crawford at uci.edu>
Modeling Facility Director
Department of Chemistry
1102 Natural Sciences II         Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
University of California, Irvine  Phone: 949-824-4508
Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20190223/49f63750/attachment.html>