[lustre-discuss] [Lwg] SC19 bof slides

[Spitz, Cory James]

Thanks, Peter.  I think you might be right that ORNL is just covered up on the left hand graphic (LoC).  For clarity, could you just tell us what the ORNL LoC contribution was for 2.13.0?

Great that you have the NoC data already.  Since you already have that data for 2.13.0, would you mind sharing it with the list too?

Thanks!
-Cory


On 1/15/20, 5:37 PM, "lwg on behalf of Peter Jones" <lwg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org on behalf of pjones at whamcloud.com> wrote:

    Cory
    
    Re James - yes he has consistently been one of the top contributors in any measurement for a number of years. ORNL appears on the right hand graphic and I think that the label is just covered by another label on the left hand graphic - the formatting of those labels is very fiddly. The scripts run to extract this data do also generate NOC and I have shown that data as well in the past but I condensed due to wanting to cover other topics in limited space. I hope that James will forgive me this oversight!
    
    Peter
    
    On 2020-01-15, 10:37 AM, "Spitz, Cory James" <cory.spitz at hpe.com> wrote:
    
        Hi, Ken.  Thanks for sharing these.
        
        Peter, I have a question and a comment/suggestion for you about the "Lustre 2.13 Contributions" pie charts.  For the LINES OF CODE contributors, I don't see ORNL.  I've got to figure that there must be some oversight.  I'm sure that James Simmons alone contributed many things to 2.13.  Surely, enough to break out of the "Other" category all on his own, right?  Then, maybe just a helpful suggestion: at the next update could you please also tell us about `# of commits` (per organization)?  I tend to think that commit count is more often a more useful metric than LOC.
        
        Thanks,
        -Cory
        
        
        On 1/13/20, 11:23 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Rawlings, Kenrick D" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of kerawlin at iu.edu> wrote:
        
            Hi Thomas,
            
            An aggregated version of the slides is available at:
            
            http://lustre.org/wp-content/uploads/SC19LustreBoF_All.pdf  
            
            There were some challenges combining them in a way that works in all PDF viewers. If there are any issues with rendering, please let me know and we can make the individual decks available as well.
            
            Thanks,
            Ken
            ​
            ----
            
            Hello,
            
            Are the slides presented during the bof in Denver available somewhere?
            
            I'm specifically looking for one of the sites presentation that gave some feedback about DoM.
            
            Regards
            
            Thomas Hamel
            _______________________________________________
            lustre-discuss mailing list
            lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
            http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org  
            
        
        
    
    _______________________________________________
    lwg mailing list
    lwg at lists.opensfs.org
    http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/lwg-opensfs.org