[lustre-discuss] lustre 2.15.3

[Khoi Mai]

We may have a security update that is wrapped up in a kernel upgrade but we
may not have tested the lustre upgrade yet to release into our production
landscape.

Was curious if it’s possible if there were others in the community that
managed their patches and upgrades that didn’t involving upgrading lustre
while patching the os kernel.


Khoi


On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:24 AM Laura Hild <lsh at jlab.org> wrote:

> Hi Khoi-
>
> You could probably back-port to 2.15.3 the specific patch or patches that
> give 2.15.4 support for EL8.9 kernels, while leaving out the other fixes in
> 2.15.4, but that raises the question of why exactly you don't want those
> other fixes but do want the newer kernel.
>
> -Laura
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Od: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> v imenu Khoi
> Mai via lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> Poslano: ponedeljek, 25. marec 2024 13:18
> Za: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> Zadeva: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.15.3
>
> Is there a pathway to compile and operate lustre version 2.15.3 on linux 8
>
> kernel-4.18.0-513.18.1.el8_9.x86_64. Or must we upgrade our lustre package
> to 2.15.4 ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Khoi
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20240329/1486a06d/attachment-0001.htm>