[Lustre-discuss] Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file system?

[D. Marc Stearman]

Sorry, I confused myself.  We have a 1.2PB filesystem that will  
remain that size.  We will be expanding our 958TB filesystem to  
~2.4PB in the near future.

-Marc

----
D. Marc Stearman
LC Lustre Systems Administrator
marc at llnl.gov
925.423.9670
Pager: 1.888.203.0641


On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:36 PM, D. Marc Stearman wrote:

> Klaus,
>
> We currently have a 1.2PB lustre filesystem that we will be expanding
> to 2.4PB in the near future.  I not sure about the highest sustained
> IOPS, but we did have a user peak 19GB/s to one of our 500TB
> filesystems recently. The backend for that was 16 DDN 8500 couplets
> with write-cache turned OFF.
>
> -Marc
>
> ----
> D. Marc Stearman
> LC Lustre Systems Administrator
> marc at llnl.gov
> 925.423.9670
> Pager: 1.888.203.0641
>
>
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Klaus Steden wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I was asked by a friend of a business contact of mine the other day
>> to share
>> some information about Lustre; seems he's planning to build what will
>> eventually be about a 3 PB file system.
>>
>> The CFS website doesn't appear to have any information on field
>> deployments
>> worth bragging about, so I figured I'd ask, just for fun; does
>> anyone know:
>>
>> - the size of the largest working Lustre file system currently in
>> the field
>> - the highest sustained number of IOPS seen with Lustre, and what the
>> backend was?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Klaus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
>> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss