[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.6.5.1 on the box with 2 interfaces
Lukas Hejtmanek
xhejtman at ics.muni.cz
Wed Sep 24 13:16:38 PDT 2008
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:58:36PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Let's start by saying putting an MDS and OSS on the same box is not good
> from both a performance and recovery point of view. If that box fails,
> recovery can fail.
Well, I guess that for the first tests it could be ok :)
>
> > I use
> > options lnet networks="tcp0(eth2),tcp1(eth0)"
>
> > Then I created the OST
> > /usr/local/lustre/sbin/mkfs.lustre --fsname=l_smaug2 --reformat --ost
> > --mgsnode=192.168.1.1 at tcp0 /dev/Scratch_VG/Scratch_2
> >
> > I mounted it:
> > mount /dev/Scratch_VG/Scratch_2 /mnt/lustre/ost0
>
> Do you get any errors from this mount?
none at all.
>
> > However, cat /proc/fs/lustre/devices shows that no OST is attached at all.
>
> What does it show?
# cat /proc/fs/lustre/devices
0 UP mgs MGS MGS 5
1 UP mgc MGC195.113.235.225 at tcp 38be3e11-3501-85e4-da0a-4b5efb287c2b 5
2 UP mdt MDS MDS_uuid 3
3 UP lov l_smaug2-mdtlov l_smaug2-mdtlov_UUID 4
4 UP mds l_smaug2-MDT0000 l_smaug2-MDT0000_UUID 3
#
>
> > What am I missing?
>
> You haven't really said what the problem is beyond the device list. Did
> you get errors? Are there any problems with clients, etc.
Yes, the client complains that mdt does not have any osts.
However, I tried it all again and it mysteriously works now. Somewhat
strange...
So sorry for the buzz.
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list