[Lustre-discuss] [Lwg] [HPDD-discuss] Lustre and ZFS notes available

[Christopher J. Morrone]

Yes, I am all for more use of http://wiki.opensfs.org.  When you make a 
page worth pointing to from the sidebar, drop me a note and I can add it.

Chris

On 08/14/2014 09:37 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
> Oops, I meant to copy lwg at lists.opensfs.org (not lustre.org).
>
> LWG, see below.
>
> Thanks,
> -Cory
>
> On 8/14/14, 11:34 AM, "Cory Spitz" <spitzcor at cray.com> wrote:
>
>> Scott,
>>
>> Perhaps there might be a way to collect 'contrib' documents that are not
>> core to Lustre with OpenSFS.  I suggest that you could make a place at
>> wiki.opensfs.org for them.  I think that we can ask the
>> lwg at lists.lustre.org group about it first (copied).
>>
>> LWG, can we host 'contrib' docs somewhere on the OpenSFS wiki?  Perhaps we
>> should create a whole new "Documentation" sidebar to get started?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Cory
>>
>> On 8/14/14, 8:41 AM, "Scott Nolin" <scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I should also add - many of those documents just don't belong in the
>>> lustre manual anyway, such as monitoring JBOD arrays. But nonetheless
>>> may be useful for some lustre installations.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 8/14/2014 8:40 AM, Scott Nolin wrote:
>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> Much of this information is notes and not in a finished format, so it's
>>>> a problem of how much time we have.
>>>>
>>>> The other issue is contributing to the manual is somewhat cumbersome as
>>>> you have to submit patches -
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Making+changes+to+the+Lustre+Man
>>>> u
>>>> al+source
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The bar there is a bit higher - we have to be pretty confident the
>>>> information that's added is correct, know if it's just for some
>>>> versions
>>>> of lustre, and so on. As opposed to simply "here are our notes that
>>>> work
>>>> for us".
>>>>
>>>> I will try to review what we have and if anything looks really
>>>> incorrect
>>>> or missing in the lustre manual we will attempt to issue a patch.
>>>>
>>>> I think in general the lustre manual is correct, but not always
>>>> sufficient. I think the process does make sure incorrect stuff doesn't
>>>> go in at least, but makes it hard to add information.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> On 8/14/2014 6:13 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>>
>>>>> Great job! Would you consider merging with the standard Lustre docs?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Documentation
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HPDD-discuss mailing list
>> HPDD-discuss at lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwg mailing list
> lwg at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/lwg-opensfs.org
> .
>