[lustre-discuss] wiki.lustre.org - input on community content

Scott Nolin scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu
Tue Apr 28 13:25:13 PDT 2015

Thank you for clarifying the OpenSFS vs lustre.org thing Chris, this 
makes sense to me.

That makes it even easier. So my suggestions now mostly boil down to 
getting links to category information in the sidebar. I'm guessing that 
can either be done manually by a site admin or with a mediawiki 
extension of some kind.

Thanks again,


On 4/28/2015 3:11 PM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 11:58 AM, Scott Nolin wrote:
>> Hello,
>> With the new lustre.org and wiki.lustre.org site there is an opportunity
>> to make this a more useful tool for community involvement with Lustre.
>> Here are my ideas for how to arrange the new site. I know Chris Morrone
>> and OpenSFS members are interested in what the community can do with
>> this.
>> Please weigh in with your ideas too.
>> 1) Top Level / Menu Bar links should lead to all the content. This
>> requires some site-level editoral work to make it sensible.
> Absolutely.
>> 2) Make a section for OpenSFS type links - I'm thinking the kind of
>> stuff that is already there, such as 'Development' 'Projects" and so on
>> - probably news and announcements too.
> Granted, OpenSFS plays a large part in planning and funding Lustre
> releases and development work, but those wiki pages are explicitly meant
> to be Lustre-centric rather than OpenSFS-centric.
>> 3) Make another section for community content. This should be also in
>> the menu bar.
> I don't think that we want to do that.  Our stance should be that the
> entire wiki is community content.  We don't want to split the
> wiki.lustre.org into community and non-community sections.  For things
> that are genuinely OpenSFS specific, they will remain on OpenSFS's wiki.
>   I believe that EOFS will do the same.
> For instance, it is my intent that
> http://wiki.opensfs.org/Lustre_Working_Group remain on the OpenSFS wiki.
>   The OpenSFS contracts will be tracked on OpenSFS's wiki.  But much of
> the output of our LWG work and contracts will result in generally
> applicable Lustre documentation that we will feed to the lustre.org wiki.
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6248 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20150428/c9b38f09/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list