[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10 on RHEL6.x?

[E.S. Rosenberg]

We created a test system that was installed with CentOS 6.x and Lustre 2.8
filled with some data and subsequently reinstalled with CentOS 7.x and
Lustre 2.9

Everything seems to have gone fine but I am actually curious if anyone else
did this pretty invasive upgrade? (Hoping to upgrade in the not-to-distant
future, maybe even directly to 2.10)

Thanks,
Eli

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jones, Peter A <peter.a.jones at intel.com>
wrote:

> Correct – RHEL 6.x support appeared for the last time in the community 2.8
> release. However, there has been some interest in seeing some kind of
> support for RHEL 6.x in the 2.10 LTS releases so I think it likely that at
> least support for clients will be reintroduced in a future 2.10.x
> maintenance release.
>
> On 8/7/17, 6:34 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of E.S. Rosenberg" <
> lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of
> esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu> wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken they haven't provided RPMs for RHEL6.x since 2.9...
> HTH,
> Eli
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Steve Barnet <barnet at icecube.wisc.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>>   I am looking to upgrade from lustre 2.8 to 2.10. I see that
>> there are no pre-built RPMs for 2.10 on RHEL6.x families.
>>
>> Did I miss them, or will I need to build from source (or
>> upgrade to Centos 7)?
>>
>> Thanks much!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> ---Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20170807/5c09b883/attachment.htm>